Whatever. :)
Sep. 23rd, 2005 10:04 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
saffronhareI consider this fair warning.
| True Neutral 60% Good, 52% Chaotic |
Plane of Existence: The Outlands, "Plane of Concordant Opposition". Description: The plane between all other outer planes. Examples of True Neutrals (Ethically Neutral, Morally Neutral) Mr. Spock Linus Torvalds Dr. Strangelove Scott Evil Batman The Punisher Switzerland Canada Not actively for or against anything. Has his or her own reasons for doing everything. Usually difficult to understand. Will keep their word if in their best interest May attack an unarmed foe May use poison May help those in need May work with others Indifferent to higher authority Indifferent to organizations True Neutral "Balancer" Some neutral [people] commit themselves philosophically to neutrality. They are of the true neutral alignment as described in Advanced Dungeons & Dragons. A true neutral [person] sees good, evil, law, and chaos as prejudices and dangerous extremes. He advocates the middle way of neutrality as the best, most balanced road in the long run. Some true neutral [people] actively support balance in the world, and seek to avoid having any one side, law or chaos, good or evil, become too powerful over them or anyone else, and will work against whichever side is the most powerful. They tend to side with the underdog in any situation, and are often opportunistic in their actions. True neutral is committed to the avoidance of extremes, and is non-judgemental. Side-Note from Xan81: Due to your Neutrality, I would really, really LOVE your feedback. Not that I don't want feedback from members of the other alignments, but a True Neutral's feeback is typically NOT emotionally, morally, politically, or socially charged. Please send me an email! I have it set to automatically email me when someone gets this score, so I know who you are ;) True Neutrals are the classic, "I just don't give a shit" alignment, and I fully understand if you don't feel that you have any responsability or obligation to sending an email/comment. Even if you did, I'm sure you'd have some difficulty in deciding what to comment about. But, I guess that depends on your tendencies :D Xan Other Alignments and Tendencies (Tendenices are what you would more often sway towards; esp. for Neutrals): 0-39% Good, 0-39% Chaotic: Lawful-Evil 0-39% Good, 40-60% Chaotic: Neutral-Evil 0-39% Good, 61-100% Chaotic: Chaotic-Evil 40-60% Good, 0-39% Chaotic: Lawful-Neutral 40-60% Good, 61-100% Chaotic: Chaotic-Neutral 61-100% Good, 0-39% Chaotic: Lawful-Good 61-100% Good, 40-60% Chaotic: Neutral-Good 61-100% Good, 61-100% Chaotic: Chaotic-Good |
 |
My test tracked 2 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:
|
| Link: The Alignment Test written by xan81 on OkCupid Free Online Dating |
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2005-09-23 03:14 pm (UTC)Er.
Date: 2005-09-23 03:39 pm (UTC)Re: Er.
Date: 2005-09-23 03:55 pm (UTC)in the right measure
Date: 2005-09-23 03:58 pm (UTC)Very Middle Pillar kind of stuff.
Re: Er.
Date: 2005-09-23 04:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-24 03:49 am (UTC)Re: in the right measure
Date: 2005-09-26 02:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-26 03:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-26 03:49 am (UTC)He's a Gryffindor, after all, and the Sorting Hat is never wrong.
Gah. Go read the books, you. :-)
no subject
Date: 2005-09-26 04:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-26 11:02 am (UTC)