maybe only a little bit futile (sigh)
Feb. 26th, 2007 09:55 amLast November, when I voted, it was frustrating that my polling place was a church. I understand that churches can be forces for good among the electorate during the voter registration and education process. I've just got an issue with the line that seems to be crossed in my mind when the government conducts business in the church.
Anyway. I resolved to vote by mail if I found out that my polling place for the next election would be at a church. (I'd previously resolved to vote early at the election office, but failed at this and had to vote at the church. Because Not Voting was not an option.) A couple of weeks ago, I got a postcard from the county election office that an election was coming up and that my polling place had changed -- to a different church. So I went online and requested an absentee ballot.
It arrived and I felt so very pleased with myself, opening up the ballot this morning to fill in all those little circles and send it in like I'd promised myself. Except. Except, except. All we're voting on this time is the JCCC Commissioners. There was a list of about eight folks, and I got to choose three or fewer. ::headdesk::
Oh, yeah. That was a significant bit of civic involvement. It's in the mail now. Fear me. Bleh.
Anyway. I resolved to vote by mail if I found out that my polling place for the next election would be at a church. (I'd previously resolved to vote early at the election office, but failed at this and had to vote at the church. Because Not Voting was not an option.) A couple of weeks ago, I got a postcard from the county election office that an election was coming up and that my polling place had changed -- to a different church. So I went online and requested an absentee ballot.
It arrived and I felt so very pleased with myself, opening up the ballot this morning to fill in all those little circles and send it in like I'd promised myself. Except. Except, except. All we're voting on this time is the JCCC Commissioners. There was a list of about eight folks, and I got to choose three or fewer. ::headdesk::
Oh, yeah. That was a significant bit of civic involvement. It's in the mail now. Fear me. Bleh.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-26 04:27 pm (UTC)I'm proud of you! Hell, I might even make up a cheer just for you!!!
no subject
Date: 2007-02-26 04:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-26 04:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-26 04:44 pm (UTC)Imagine how pissed off I'd been to have to go vote at the church for that? I enclosed a little note of protest about the polling place with my ballot. Maybe it'll stand out more since this is likely to be a low-participation election.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-26 05:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-26 05:23 pm (UTC)I don't know if we ought to wear little pleated skirts or jackboots. Maybe both? Decisions, decisions.
Ha! I should put together a poll. That'd be all appropriate 'n shit. :)
*Not making light of the process and stuff. Just wildly amused. As
no subject
Date: 2007-02-26 05:31 pm (UTC)Besides, have you not noticed that we are in the habit of not letting people get away with downplaying their successes? It's a theme in our happy little group, I think.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-26 05:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-26 05:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-26 06:13 pm (UTC)That's wonderful! I am glad that you take voting so seriously. Something that you should be aware of though... if there is no concern over the tally, mailed votes are not counted. Mailed in ballots are only counted when it is a close enough race that the electorate feels they need to be...
Not that I want to rain on your parade, just something you should be aware of...
no subject
Date: 2007-02-26 06:31 pm (UTC)Sometimes I wish I could be more idealistic when it comes to voting, but it's hard for me to be anything but a cynic when it comes to givernment.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-26 06:34 pm (UTC)That spelling was actually unintentional (or at least subconscious).
no subject
Date: 2007-02-26 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-26 07:20 pm (UTC)If the demographics of who's voting absentee change, though, then yeah it might make a difference.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-26 07:40 pm (UTC)No, RLY?
Date: 2007-02-26 07:55 pm (UTC):)
Re: No, RLY?
Date: 2007-02-26 08:13 pm (UTC)